« Trolley Problems | Main | The Origins of Property II »

January 29, 2012

Comments

Foppe De Haan

Could you please explain to me
a. why it makes sense to you to posit a society with only a single rule and no obligations between persons (that you think worth mentioning)? and
b. why they would not understand the notion of a promise until bob first makes one, to then suddenly decide that they would feel obliged to keep it? (Or well, apparently they don't feel obliged, which is why you write that bob gives Wilt the right to beat him into submission if he doesn't "respect" wilt's exclusive right to that spot. But anyway.)

Yes, property relations have to do with exclusion, but there are ever more social ways to guarantee the honoring of such relationships (and the attendant obligations) than via crude threats to use force. Your parable ignores this completely, though..
Please consider reading David Graeber's "Manners, Deference and Private Property". Roughly the same topic, and, at least to me, fairly compelling.

A Facebook User

But he's the author. He, not you, decides what to write. What's important is that it be amusing, provocative or in some other way worthy of attention. Not that it meet a someone else's lawerly fault-finding (and I'm a lawyer).

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Patents